9 . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police being scrupulously fair for the offender as well as Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts but they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The plenty of this power casts an obligation within the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this can be a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In case the parents on the boy or girl will not approve of these kinds of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they can do if they are able to Reduce off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male that's a major, the couple is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives this sort of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to process by instituting criminal proceedings with the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by regulation.

The ruling with the first court created case legislation that must be accompanied by other courts till or Until both new regulation is created, or perhaps a higher court rules differently.

Unfortunately, that wasn't true. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son informed his parents that the boy experienced molested him. The boy was arrested two days later, and admitted to owning sexually molested the few’s son several times.

These past decisions are called "case regulation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Permit the decision stand"—could be the principle by which judges are bound to this kind of past decisions, drawing on set up judicial authority to formulate their positions.

116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice in the Peace u/s 22-A will not be obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing on the accused party; nor obliged to essentially or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to consider all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are many of the relevant factors. Read more

Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. 12. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons getting their character earlier mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are to generally be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is a condition precedent for appointment to some Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to a Government service would be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to website try and do away with the candidature of your petitioner. Read more

161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, It is additionally a properly-recognized proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is subject into the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.

Summaries provide an essential glimpse into the intricate landscape of Environment and Climate Laws in Pakistan. Delving into this realm unveils a mosaic of regulations and procedures aimed at safeguarding natural resources, mitigating environmental degradation, and combating climate change.

Federalism also plays a major role in determining the authority of case law in the particular court. Indeed, each circuit has its possess list of binding case regulation. As a result, a judgment rendered while in the Ninth Circuit will not be binding during the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.

Any court could find to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to reach a different summary. The validity of this kind of distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to the higher court.

Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there may be a person or more judgments provided (or reported). Only the reason with the decision in the majority can represent a binding precedent, but all can be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning could be adopted within an argument.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, Additionally it is a properly-proven proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is topic towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence.